Morning Thoughts on
Matthew 16:13-14 |
|
Elder
Phillip N. Conley |
Matthew 16:13-14, "When Jesus came into the coasts of
Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do
men say that I the Son of man am? And they said, Some say
that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others,
Jeremias, or one of the prophets."
This
morning, it continues to frustrate me when I hear the
statement, "Jesus was just a good man." Then, when I
consider the time period that Jesus walked this earth, it is
evident that they said the same thing then as they do now.
Notice the line-up of candidates that "some say" put forth.
In each and every case, they were just "good men." One
cannot read the Scriptures and doubt the piety of John the
Baptist, Elias (Elijah), Jeremias (Jeremiah), or the
prophets that lived and prophesied in the Old Testament.
Their goodness (which came from on High) is evidenced in
their writings, teachings, mannerisms, and conversation.
However, none of them was the Lord from heaven. They were
all natural men that would have had no goodness to claim or
evidence to show had not the grace of this One touched them.
So, as flattering as it would be for someone to compare me
with one of those men, it is nothing short of blasphemy to
call Jesus Christ one of those men.
However,
something else about that statement, "Jesus was just a good
man" is even more troubling. This is the difference between
what people say today as opposed to Matthew 16. In that day,
they said that "thou art" one of these other men. Notice the
tense of the phrase. They are speaking in the present tense
as Christ was physically there on earth for them to know
that He was alive. Therefore, as blasphemous as it was then
to call Him just a good man, it is even more blasphemous now
as their comment speaks of Him in the past tense. Jesus was
a perfect man then, and He is still a perfect man now. The
difference between then and now in His humanity is that now
it is glorified. He is no less the GodMan today than He was
then. Therefore, when someone says that He "was," it implies
there is something about Him lacking today.
While some might say this is ax grinding, all the tactics
leveled against our Saviour today boil down to a basic
principle that they will deny His Deity and eternal Sonship
and thereby deny His bodily resurrection. That is the main
thrust of their attack. Therefore, by saying that He "was,"
they are implying that His body did not come out. When we
pass from this life, there is a sense in which people can
say we "were." While our spirit and soul are at home in
glory, our body is still literally in the ground.
Even
though our eternal Father sees us already glorified in His
Son's image, our flesh still awaits that glorious day when
time shall be no more, and it is changed. Therefore, after
this life is over, we "were" to those that remain. However,
to those at home with the Lord and those that are alive on
the earth today, Jesus Christ "IS" to each and every one of
His people. He is complete in body, soul, and spirit with no
part lacking in the least. Therefore, when the question is
asked today, it should still be stated, "Whom do men say
that I the Son of man am?"
He still
is, and the great I AM will never pass away. Therefore, let
us boldly defend the foundational tenet that the man Christ
Jesus is verily the Lord of Glory who will one day part the
skies to take us home with Him.
|